Open Access

Reliability of the American Community Survey for unintentional drowning and submersion injury surveillance: a comprehensive assessment of 10 socioeconomic indicators derived from the 2006–2013 annual and multi-year data cycles

Injury Epidemiology20152:33

DOI: 10.1186/s40621-015-0065-0

Received: 26 October 2015

Accepted: 21 December 2015

Published: 29 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Our objective was to evaluate the reliability and predictability of ten socioeconomic indicators obtained from the 2006–2013 annual and multi-year ACS data cycles for unintentional drowning and submersion injury surveillance.

Methods

Each indicator was evaluated using its margin of error and coefficient of variation. For the multi-year data cycles we calculated the frequency that estimates for the same geographic areas from consecutive surveys were statistically significantly different. Relative risk estimates of drowning-related deaths were constructed using the National Center for Health Statistics compressed mortality file. All analyses were derived using census counties.

Results

Five of the ten socioeconomic indicators derived from the annual and multi-year data cycles produced high reliability CV estimates for at least 85 % of all US counties. On average, differences in socioeconomic characteristics for the same geographic areas for consecutive 3- and 5-year data cycles were unlikely to be caused by sampling error in only 17 % (5–89 %) and 21 % (5–93 %) of all counties. No indicator produced statistically significant relative risk estimates across all data cycles and survey years.

Conclusions

The reliability of the annual and multi-year county-level ACS data cycles varies by census indicator. More than 75 % of the differences in estimates between consecutive multi-year surveys are likely to have occurred as a result of sampling error, suggesting that researchers should be judicious when interpreting overlapping survey data as reflective of real changes in socioeconomic conditions. Although no indicator predicted disparities in drowning-related injury mortality across all data cycles and years, further studies are needed to determine if these associations remain consistent at different geographic scales and for injury morbidity.

Keywords

American Community Survey Injuries Drowning Social class Risk

Background

Drowning-related deaths continue to be a major public health problem in the United States (US). Between 2009 and 2013 it was the third most common type of injury-related death among children under five and the second most common among adolescents ages five to fourteen, accounting for 3488 child and adolescent deaths (Centers for Disease Control. Causes of Injury Death: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & Control 2013). Over this same period it remained a top ten cause of all injury-related deaths among all persons under the age of 55.

Factors such as lower socioeconomic status, age, gender, ethnicity, alcohol, and living in a rural environment all increase risk of hospitalization or death from drowning (Brenner et al. 2001; Browne et al. 2003; Burrows et al. 2013; Giashuddin et al. 2009; Gilchrist & Parker 2014; Kim et al. 2007; Peek-Asa et al. 2004; Saluja et al. 2006; Thompson & Rivara 2000; Wright et al. 2013). Among rural populations, risks are attributable to greater access to open water sources, irrigation ditches, and watering troughs for livestock. Lack of adequate fencing and pool enclosures often characterize urban-related incidence rates, whereas factors such as low income are pervasive. These factors are routinely monitored and are part of numerous prevention and intervention initiatives (Cortes et al. 2006; Depczynski et al. 2009; Girasek 2011). Recent systematic reviews show that these factors remain indicative of variation in risk both in the US and abroad (Leavy et al. 2015a; Leavy et al. 2015b; Wallis et al. 2015).

However, US investigators tasked with monitoring drowning-related injuries now face a particular difficulty measuring its burden. This is because the 2010 replacement of the long form decennial census with the American Community Survey (ACS) fundamentally changed the structure of the geographic and socioeconomic data for the population. There are two primary differences between the ACS and the decennial census. First, the ACS is a rolling survey. Each month, approximately 250,000 households are interviewed using multiple survey mediums (US Census Bureau 2008) The survey responses are then aggregated into 1-year periods for annual release, with larger pools obtained prior to the release of the multi-year cycles. The structure and sample size of the ACS is in contrast to the decennial census, which obtained point-in-time responses from 1 out of 6 households every 10 years. Second, the ACS provides improved access to current socioeconomic information on the US population through the release of an annual, 3-year, and 5-year data cycles. The multi-year cycles are considered to be more reliable as they contain estimates from three and five times as many responses and represent a larger number of areas (US Census Bureau 2009) This is particularly relevant for subgroup questions that impact a smaller proportion of the population (e.g. female head of household with no husband and with children at home under 18 years of age) compared to the population profile questions (e.g. % male).

Accordingly, there are now two primary challenges attributed to the shift from the decennial census to the ACS. The first challenge pertains to the reliability of the ACS. For example, one study found that the margins of error (MOE) for certain Census Tracts increased over 80 % from the 2000 decennial census (Alexander 2002). Another study found that the MOE for the 5-year cycle was large enough to cause census tracts to move from highest into the lowest income quartile (Spielman et al. 2014). A more profound problem was that the variability predominated within marginalized areas. The second challenge pertains to coverage. For example, the annual data cycle is only released for geographic areas of at least 65,000 persons whereas the 3-year cycle is only available for areas of at least 20,000 persons. This effectively eliminates approximately 75 % of what are predominantly rural and non-metropolitan counties from annual surveillance, while providing current information for approximately 58 % of the population every 3 years.

One proposed strategy to circumvent limited access to current socioeconomic information from the ACS is to use consecutive multi-year surveys to represent ‘annual’ socioeconomic characteristics (US Census Bureau 2009). However, the fundamental challenge of this approach is that any difference in the estimates could be driven by data from non-overlapping survey years. For example, 80 % of the ACS estimates from the 2012 5-year data cycle (e.g. 2008–2012 surveys) overlap the 2013 release file (e.g. years 2009–2013). If used consecutively, 67 % of the estimates for consecutive 3-year data cycles overlap. As such, any comparison using overlapping survey periods must determine whether the observed differences are unlikely to have occurred by chance due to sampling error.

We examined the reliability and predictability of the annual and multi-year ACS data cycles for measuring socioeconomic disparities in drowning-related injury mortality across the US between 2006 and 2013 using county-level data. Our analysis included ten indicators previously used for quantifying socioeconomic disparities in drowning-related injury rates both in the US and abroad. Our primary objective was to record the amount of variability in the indicators when constructed using the annual and multi-year data cycles. Our secondary objective was to determine whether there was a particular data cycle and indicator that could facilitate better detection of differences in injury risk over time.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study of drowning-related injury mortality incidence calculated from the annual and multi-year ACS data cycles. Data regarding the injured population were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) annual detailed mortality file for all US residents for the period 2006–2013. Drowning-related fatalities were specified using International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) cause of death codes, inclusive of W65-W74. Mortality and socioeconomic data files were linked using county identification numbers and evaluated as age adjusted rates. County geographic boundaries were selected for analysis because they are the finest administrative data available for the annual ACS data cycle. County boundaries are also robust for national injury and disease surveillance (Singh 2003; Wilkinson & Pickett 2008).

Reliability of the ACS data cycles was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) for each estimate. The National Research Council defines a “reasonable standard of precision” as a CV percentage between 0 % and 12 % (National Research Council 2007). Here, we use a categorical rankings of “high reliability” (0–12 %), “moderate reliability” (12–40 %), and “low reliability” (>40 %) to assess the estimates (Environmental Systems Research Institute. The American Community Survey: An ESRI white paper: ESRI 2014). The standard error required to construct each CV was calculated using an adjustment factor of 95 % confidence. This requires multiplying the margin of error (MOE) for each estimate or its numerator/denominator by a factor equal to 1.960/1.645. We chose a 95 % confidence as opposed to the 90 % confidence that is released by the ACS in order to reduce the likelihood of false inference from the number of comparisons of each indicator using the three survey cycles. All calculations were derived using ACS guidelines for constructing proportions and ratios (US Census Bureau 2009). The calculation steps for each indicator are listed in Table 1. The indicators we evaluated were selected based on their previous application for monitoring drowning-related injuries in the US (Brenner et al. 2001; Browne et al. 2003; Gilchrist & Parker 2014; Peek-Asa et al. 2004; Saluja et al. 2006; Thompson & Rivara 2000; Wright et al. 2013) and abroad (Burrows et al. 2013; Giashuddin et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2007) All geographic and socioeconomic files were downloaded from the American Fact Finder database.
Table 1

Socioeconomic construct description built from the American Community Survey annual and multi-year estimates. File names for calculation based on 2013 ACS data file headings

Construct

Definition

ACS data file

Calculation

% US residency less than 1 years

Percent of population living abroad one year ago

DP02

Abroad [HC01_VC126] / Population 1 year and over [HC01_VC119]

% College/postgraduate degree

Percent of persons, age 25 years and older, with an associate’s, bachelor’s, graduate or professional degree

DP02

(Associate’s degree [HC01_VC90] + bachelor’s degree [HC01_VC91] + graduate or professional degree [HC01_VC92])/Population 25 years and over [HC01_VC85]

% High school graduates

Percent of population, age 25 years and older, with a high school diploma

DP02

High school graduate (included equivalency) [HC01_VC88]/Population 25 years and over [HC01_VC85]

% Black

Percent of black or African American population

DP05

Black of African American [HC01_VC79] / Total population – race alone or in combination with any other [HC01_VC77]

% Hispanic

Percent of Hispanic or Latino population

DP05

Hispanic or Latino (of any race) [HC01_VC88]/Total population [HC01_VC87]

% Non-white

Percent of non-white population

DP05

(Total population – race alone or in combination with any other [HC01_VC77]– White [HC01_VC78]) / Total population – race alone or in combination with any other [HC01_VC77]

Gini coefficient

A measure of income inequality, reflects the distribution of income (2011 ACS calculations)

B19083

Gini index [HD01_VD01]

Median household income

Median household income (dollars)

DP03

Median household income [HC01_VC85]

% Unemployment

Percent of population, 16 years and older, in the labor force and unemployed

DP03

In the labor force - Unemployed [HC01_VC07]/Employment status [HC01_VC04]

County population

Total population of the county

DP05

(Male [HC01_VC04] + Female [HC01_VC05])

Statistically valid measures of change between consecutive multi-year surveys can be calculated to determine whether ACS estimates for the same geographic areas are statistically significantly different.

The steps required to approximate the difference in standard errors between overlapping surveys are published by the ACS (US Census Bureau 2009) In this study, we report the number and percentage of census areas within each multi-year data cycle having estimates that likely reflect true changes in socioeconomic conditions. Here, we report two different models for evaluating the reliability of overlapping surveys. In the first model, differences in the estimates for the same geographic area were compared using the maximum amount of overlap between adjacent surveys. For example, the maximum amount of overlap for consecutive 5-year survey occurs when using the 2012 and 2013 survey cycles to represent annual change in socioeconomic conditions. This is the only method that allows for annual surveillance of socioeconomic conditions for all US counties. In the second model, we evaluated differences between the estimates using the minimum amount of overlap between consecutive surveys. The minimal amount of overlap occurs when comparing the 2009 and 2013 5-year data cycles, effectively placing a 4-year gap in annual surveillance.

We used negative binomial regression to compare relative risk estimates for each estimate using the annual and multi-year data cycles. All rates were age-adjusted and weighted using the 2000 US standard million population. For each data cycle, relative risk estimates were derived from a single calendar year of drowning-related injury deaths. For example, only drowning-related deaths recorded in 2009 were used when comparing estimates generated from the 2009 annual cycle and the 2009 3-year and 5-year data cycles. Our rationale for comparing estimates for a single calendar year was two-fold. First, our objective was to determine which data cycle and socioeconomic indicator produced the greatest number of statistically significantly relative risk estimates over time. Second, if relative risk estimates are similar across survey cycles it would support the use of using a limited but annually updated data file for approximating injury risk on a national scale. The data analysis for this study was generated using SAS software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.

Results

Between 2006 and 2013 there were 28,367 deaths attributed to unintentional drowning and submersions recorded by the NCHS. Thirty-six records were missing the person’s age and were excluded. Nationally, the proportion of drowning deaths during this period was highest among adults aged 45 to 64 (25.3 %) and 25 to 44 (23.5 %) and lowest among children and adolescents aged 5 to 14 (6.7 %) (Table 2). The majority of drowning victims were male (77.5 %) and White non-Hispanic (68.5 %). The numbers of drowning-related deaths are relatively low compared to all-cause injury mortality, accounting for less than 2 % of all-cause injury-related deaths (ICD10: V01–Y36, Y85–Y87, Y89, U01.0-U01.3, U01.5-U01.9, U02, U03) between 2006 and 2013.
Table 2

Characteristics of US unintentional drowning and submersion deaths: 2006–2013

 

Number (%)

Gender

 

 Males

21,975 (77.5)

 Females

6392 (22.5)

Age, y

 

 Under 5

3842 (13.6)

 5 to 14

1895 (6.7)

 15–24

4603 (16.2)

 25–44

6658 (23.5)

 45–64

7173 (25.3)

 Over 64

4160 (14.7)

Race/ethnicity

 

White, non-Hispanic

18,377 (64.8)

Black, non-Hispanic

4305. (15.2)

Hispanic

3845 (13.5)

Native American

474 (1.7)

Asian/Pacific Islander

1242 (4.4)

Not specified

124 (0.4)

Source: National Center for Health Statistics Compressed Mortality File, 2006–2013

The proportion of high, moderate, and low CV scores for each ACS estimate for the annual and multi-year data cycles are shown in Table 3. The first column in the table represents the number of census counties for each cycle that had reportable data to build the estimate. The subsequent columns list the percentages of high, moderate, and low reliability CV estimates for each indicator. The first 3-year data cycle was released in 2007 and is derived from 2005–2007 household responses. The first 5-year data cycle was released in 2009 and is derived from 2005–2009 household responses.
Table 3

Percentage of census areas (counties) having ‘High Reliability’ (M, CV 12–40 %) and ‘Low Reliability’ (L, >40 %) Coefficient of Variation (CV), annual, 3 years and 5-years American Community Survey (ACS) data cycles (95 % confidence level)

 

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

 

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

n

H

M

L

Annual ACS data cycle

                                

% US residency less than 1 year

746

1.7

35.9

62.3

745

1.6

36.0

62.4

449

1.7

33.8

64.5

751

1.5

29.7

68.8

767

1.3

33.0

65.7

775

1.3

33.4

65.3

786

2.4

36.3

61.3

791

1.8

36.5

61.7

% college/postgraduate degree

780

99.0

1.0

0.0

787

98.7

1.3

0.0

788

98.9

1.1

0.0

788

99.1

0.9

0.0

803

98.6

1.4

0.0

809

98.6

1.4

0.0

811

99.6

0.4

0.0

812

99.6

0.4

0.0

% high school graduates

780

100.0

0.0

0.0

787

99.6

0.4

0.0

788

99.5

0.5

0.0

788

99.9

0.1

0.0

807

99.8

0.3

0.0

809

99.5

0.5

0.0

811

99.8

0.3

0.0

812

99.5

0.5

0.0

% African American

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

*

*

*

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% Hispanic

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

*

*

*

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% non-white

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

*

*

*

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Gini coefficient

783

99.7

0.3

0.0

788

99.6

0.4

0.0

790

99.8

0.3

0.0

792

99.8

0.3

0.0

807

99.9

0.1

0.0

811

99.5

0.5

0.0

814

99.6

0.4

0.0

817

99.9

0.1

0.0

Median household income

783

99.9

0.1

0.0

788

99.9

0.1

0.0

790

99.9

0.9

0.0

792

99.2

0.8

0.0

807

99.5

0.5

0.0

811

99.1

0.9

0.0

814

99.3

0.7

0.0

817

99.3

0.7

0.0

% Unemployment

776

30.2

69.9

0.0

780

29.1

70.9

0.0

780

28.0

71.8

0.3

792

41.5

58.5

0.0

807

45.2

54.8

0.0

807

39.7

60.4

0.0

813

42.8

57.2

0.0

813

35.9

63.7

0.4

Country population

783

100.0

0.0

0.0

780

100.0

0.0

0.0

789

100.0

0.0

0.0

790

100.0

0.0

0.0

807

100.0

0.0

0.0

810

100.0

0.0

0.0

813

100.0

0.0

0.0

816

100.0

0.0

0.0

3-year ACS data cylce

                                

% US residency less than 1 year

*

*

*

*

1698

3.1

31.4

65.6

1711

1.1

18.6

80.3

1702

3.4

31.0

65.6

1696

3.5

30.6

65.9

1721

3.5

30.7

65.8

1728

3.8

32.2

63.9

1745

3.8

32.8

63.4

% college/postgraduate degree

*

*

*

*

1799

95.1

5.0

0.0

1803

95.3

4.7

0.0

1808

96.0

4.0

0.0

1831

96.8

3.2

0.0

1828

97.3

2.7

0.0

1826

98.1

1.9

0.0

1824

99.7

0.3

0.0

% high school graduates

*

*

*

*

1799

99.8

0.2

0.0

1803

99.7

0.3

0.0

1808

99.7

0.3

0.0

1831

99.8

0.2

0.0

1828

99.9

0.1

0.0

1826

99.8

0.2

0.0

1824

99.7

0.3

0.0

% African American

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% Hispanic

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% non-white

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Gini coefficient

*

*

*

*

1817

99.9

0.1

0.0

1822

99.8

0.2

0.0

1823

99.8

0.2

0.0

1843

99.8

0.2

0.0

1844

99.8

0.2

0.0

1846

99.8

0.2

0.0

1847

100.0

0.0

0.0

Median household income

*

*

*

*

1817

99.2

0.8

0.0

1822

99.3

0.7

0.0

1823

99.3

0.7

0.0

1843

99.2

0.8

0.0

1844

99.3

0.7

0.0

1846

99.4

0.6

0.0

1847

99.3

0.7

0.0

% Unemployment

*

*

*

*

1788

35.1

63.7

1.2

1806

40.5

58.4

1.2

1841

52.8

47.1

0.1

1832

46.7

52.4

1.0

1841

52.8

47.1

0.1

1844

54.2

45.7

0.2

1842

52.5

47.4

0.1

Country population

*

*

*

*

1804

100.0

0.0

0.0

1809

100.0

0.0

0.0

1811

100.0

0.0

0.0

1832

100.0

0.0

0.0

1835

100.0

0.0

0.0

1834

100.0

0.0

0.0

1833

100.0

0.0

0.0

5-year ACS data cycle

                                

% US residency less than 1 year

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

2691

4.9

30.4

64.7

2686

4.1

27.3

68.6

2745

4.4

26.8

68.7

2744

4.2

28.5

67.3

2748

5.2

31.3

63.5

% college/postgraduate degree

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

3103

88.9

13.1

0.0

3100

87.1

12.9

0.1

3108

88.3

11.7

0.1

3109

90.0

10.0

0.0

3103

91.4

8.5

0.1

% high school graduates

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

3104

96.8

3.0

0.1

3099

96.8

3.1

0.1

3109

96.9

3.0

0.1

3110

97.0

2.9

0.0

3105

97.2

2.8

0.0

% African American

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% Hispanic

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

% non-white

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Gini coefficient

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

1823

100

0

0

3143

98.8

1.2

0.0

3143

98.8

1.1

0.0

3143

98.8

1.2

0.0

3143

98.8

1.2

0.0

Median household income

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

3143

95.4

4.6

0.1

3143

95.3

4.7

0.0

3143

95.2

4.7

0.1

3143

95.3

4.7

0.0

3143

95.9

4.1

0.0

% Unemployment

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

3132

35.6

56.3

8.1

3131

39.3

54.1

6.6

3133

42.2

51.8

6.0

3136

44.5

50.0

5.4

3139

47.0

48.2

4.8

Country population

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

3096

99.1

0.9

0.0

3097

99.0

0.9

0.0

3111

99.1

0.8

0.0

3121

99.2

0.8

0.0

3116

99.4

0.6

0.0

--estimate not compared because the estimate is controlled

*ACS data cycle not available

Five of the ten indicators within the annual ACS data cycle, including % college/postgraduate degree, % high school graduates, Gini coefficient, median household income, and county population, generated high reliability CV estimates for at least 98 % of all counties each year between 2006 and 2013. These same indicators generated high reliability estimates for at least 95 % of all census counties for the 2007–2013 3-year file. Within the 5-year cycle, the proportion of census areas with high reliability CV estimates was reduced, but none of the same indicators generated high reliability CV estimates for less than 85 % of all counties. Across all cycles, the proportion of ‘low reliability’ CV estimates was greatest for the indicator % US residency less than 1 year, with at least 60 % of all census areas for all data cycles having low reliability. The CV for the remaining indicators could not be compared because all are released as controlled estimates.

Table 4 shows the percentage of the same geographic areas having estimates that can be considered statistically different (p < 0.05) between sequential and semi-sequential multi-year data cycles. Of all indicators and across all configurations, changes in county population were the least likely to be attributed to sampling error. Among the other indicators, the likelihood that the observed differences in the estimate was attributed to real changes in area socioeconomic conditions varied. For example, changes in area unemployment rates between consecutive 3-year surveys were statistically significantly different in as few as 13 % of all counties to as many as 89 % of all counties depending on survey year.
Table 4

number and percentage of all census areas (US counties) having statistically significantly different estimates for the same geographic areas across consecutive and non-consecutive multi-year data cycles (95 % confidence level)

 

ACS 3-year data cycles

ACS 5-year data cycles

 

Maximum overlap

Minimum overlap

Maximum overlap

Miximum overlap

 

2009 vs 2010

2010 vs 2011

2011 vs 2012

2012 vs 2013

2009 vs 2011

2010 vs 2012

2011 vs 2013

2009 vs 2010

2010 vs 2011

2011 vs 2012

2012 vs 2013

2009 vs 2013

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

US residency less than 5 years

132

7.1

146

7.9

131

7.1

130

7.0

113

6.1

100

5.4

69

3.7

267

8.5

340

10.8

268

8.5

321

10.2

165

5.2

College/postgraduate degree

167

9.0

126

6.8

136

7.4

168

9.1

162

8.7

171

9.2

206

11.0

464

14.8

311

9.9

320

10.2

367

11.7

713

22.7

High school graduates

258

14.0

136

7.4

117

6.3

152

8.2

197

10.7

125

6.8

244

13.2

430

13.7

434

13.8

376

12.0

275

8.7

570

18.1

African American

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Hispanic

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Non-white

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

Gini coefficient

93

5.0

98

5.3

115

6.2

131

7.1

339

18.4

376

376

20.3

150

8.1

166

5.3

217

6.9

247

321

10.2

166

5.3

Median household income

168

9.1

139

7.5

130

7.0

155

8.4

489

26.5

1144

61.9

175

9.5

543

17.3

705

22.4

356

11.3

266

8.5

797

25.4

Unemployment

766

41.4

656

35.5

243

13.1

1642

88.8

973

52.7

497

26.9

1303

70.5

975

31.0

875

27.8

658

20.9

2928

93.2

2601

82.8

County population

1351

73.1

681

36.8

685

37.0

664

35.9

1281

69.4

813

44.0

805

43.5

2366

75.3

1253

39.9

1233

39.2

1205

38.3

2104

66.9

For both multi-year data cycles, using the minimum number of years of overlap between survey years improved the reliability of the estimates. For the 3-year data cycle, changes in socioeconomic characteristics for approximately 25 % of all census counties (range 4 to 70 %) were attributed to real changes in area conditions when survey cycles were used every 2 years, compared to an average of 17 % of all counties (range 5 to 89 %) when survey cycles were used consecutively. Similarly, changes in socioeconomic characteristics for approximately 32 % (range 5 to 83 %) of all census areas in the 5-year file were attributed to real changes in area conditions when there was a 4-year lag between survey years compared to an average of 21 % of all counties (range 5 to 93 %) when survey cycles were used consecutively.

Table 5 shows age-adjusted relative risk estimates in drowning-related deaths across the US from 2006–2013 using all ten indicators. The indicators are partitioned by survey year as well as data cycle. Due to the release of the first 5-year data cycle in 2009 there is 1 year of overlap in the comparison of the 5-year data cycles. Annual mortality estimates for 2005 were excluded because the same person file (DP05) used to construct the age-adjusted rates was not publically available until 2006. Deaths occurring in census counties having no recorded population denominator were excluded.
Table 5

Comparison of relative risk (RR) estimates for related injury mortality rates across ACS survey cycles, 2006–2013

Socioeconomic indicator

ACS data Cyclea

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

% US residency less than 1 year

Annual cycle

1.29 (0.93–1.77)

1.27 (1.01–1.58)

1.42 (1.18–1.171)

1.05 (0.66–1.66)

1.26 (1.07–1.49)

1.22 (0.93–1.59)

1.08 (0.91–1.28)

1.29 (1.15–1.46)

 

3-year cycle

--

1.07 (0.92–1.25)

1.15 (1.04–1.28)

1.07 (0.95–1.20)

1.66 (1.14–2.41)

0.98 (0.78–1.21)

0.90 (0.69–1.17)

1.33 (1.16–1.53)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

1.09 (0.71–1.67)

1.29 (1.14–1.47)

1.05 (0.51–2.19)

0.84 (0.57–1.24)

1.04 (0.71–1.52)

 

Annual cycle

1.28 (1.02–1.61)

0.87 (0.76–0.98)

1.05 (0.88–1.25)

1.05 (0.94–1.18)

1.14 (1.01–1.29)

1.01 (0.85–1.19)

1.17 (0.95–1.46)

0.82 (0.73–0.92)

% college/postgraduate degree

3-year cycle

--

0.89 (0.78–1.01)

1.23 (1.10–1.38)

0.92 (0.82–1.02)

0.91 (0.81–1.02)

1.18 (1.05–1.32)

1.13 (0.82–1.57)

0.79 (0.58–1.08)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

1.16 (1.02–1.31)

1.01 (0.90–1.15)

1.13 (1.01–1.29)

1.31 (0.91–1.87)

0.84 (0.57–1.25)

 

Annual cycle

1.02 (0.75–1.40)

0.90 (0.61–1.34)

1.13 (0.64–1.97)

1.55 (1.37–1.74)

1.16 (1.03–1.31)

1.02 (0.90–1.15)

0.88 (0.49–1.56)

1.25 (0.75–2.08)

% high school graduates

3-year cycle

--

1.24 (0.88–1.76)

1.16 (1.04–1.32)

1.30 (0.90–1.88)

1.40 (1.05–1.86)

0.81 (0.67–0.99)

0.86 (0.76–0.97)

1.40 (1.23–1.59)

 

5-year

--

--

--

1.31 (1.14–1.49)

1.25 (0.95–1.66)

0.96 (0.75–1.24)

0.91 (0.52–1.60)

1.27 (1.11–1.46)

 

Annual cycle

1.08 (0.90–1.30)

1.07 (0.94–1.21)

0.94 (0.65–1.36)

0.88 (0.70–1.09)

1.02 (0.79–1.32)

0.88 (0.74–1.03)

0.86 (0.76–0.98)

0.56 (0.42–0.75)

% African American

3-year cycle

--

1.04 (0.90–1.20)

1.10 (0.78–1.56)

1.25 (0.97–1.61)

1.00 (0.75–1.31)

0.92 (0.81–1.04)

0.94 (0.77–1.15)

0.67 (0.53–0.85)

 

5-year

--

--

--

1.08 (0.92–1.27)

0.98 (0.74–1.26)

0.87 (0.78–0.97)

0.71 (0.63–0.79)

0.80 (0.68–0.94)

 

Annual cycle

1.56 (1.29–1.89)

1.14 (0.86–1.50)

1.53 (1.04–2.25)

1.58 (1.39–1.79)

1.44 (0.87–2.38)

1.49 (0.77–2.89)

1.09 (0.75–1.57)

1.62 (1.37–1.92)

% Hispanic

3-year cycle

--

1.05 (0.91–1.20)

1.10 (0.97–1.25)

1.39 (1.24–1.56)

1.44 (1.28–1.62)

0.98 (0.87–1.09)

1.06 (0.87–1.30)

1.38 (0.90–2.11)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

1.27 (1.13–1.43)

1.35 (1.20–1.52)

1.18 (1.05–1.33)

1.13 (0.75–1.69)

1.22 (0.72–2.08)

 

Annual cycle

1.26 (1.11–1.43)

1.00 (0.59–1.70)

0.95 (0.84–1.07)

1.08 (0.96–1.22)

1.42 (1.07–1.88)

0.92 (0.62–1.37)

0.79 (0.49–1.26)

1.02 (0.91–1.16)

% non-white

3-year cycle

--

1.30 (0.78–2.18)

1.15 (0.84–1.57)

1.47 (0.76–2.85)

1.34 (0.91–1.96)

0.83 (0.74–0.94)

0.82 (0.68–1.00)

1.09 (0.77–1.53)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

1.24 (1.11–1.39)

1.44 (0.88–2.32)

0.86 (0.77–0.97)

1.02 (0.91–1.15)

1.04 (0.61–1.79)

 

Annual cycle

0.74 (0.52–1.07)

1.13 (1.00–1.28)

0.95 (0.54–1.67)

1.09 (0.79–1.50)

1.31 (1.04–1.65)

0.93 (0.71–1.22)

1.37 (1.00–1.86)

1.24 (0.80–1.92)

Gini coefficient

3-year cycle

--

1.25 (1.11–1.41)

1.25 (0.97–1.61)

1.36 (0.77–2.40)

1.38 (0.77–2.48)

1.02 (0.55–1.93)

1.18 (1.06–1.33)

1.19 (0.92–1.54)

 

5-year

--

--

--

1.45 (0.80–2.62)

1.35 (0.80–2.26)

1.10 (0.71–1.70)

1.09 (0.98–1.22)

1.24 (1.11–1.38)

 

Annual cycle

0.84 (0.56–1.28)

0.63 (0.40–0.98)

0.98 (0.81–1.20)

1.06 (0.88–1.30)

1.09 (0.94–1.27)

1.17 (1.04–1.32)

1.29 (0.95–1.74)

0.73 (0.49–1.08)

Median household income

3-year cycle

--

0.78 (0.56–1.08)

1.22 (0.84–1.77)

1.21 (0.71–2.05)

1.05 (0.86–1.27)

1.30 (1.09–1.54)

1.23 (1.09–1.54)

0.67 (0.42–1.09)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

1.17 (0.95–1.45)

1.00 (0.83–1.20)

1.21 (1.09–1.37)

1.24 (0.92–1.67)

0.74 (0.60–0.92)

 

Annual cycle

0.83 (0.39–1.78)

0.62 (0.31–1.26)

1.73 (0.94–3.16)

0.99 (0.53–1.85)

1.77 (0.88–3.57)

1.70 (0.91–3.16)

1.24 (0.65–2.36)

0.87 (0.47–1.62)

% Unemployment

3-year cycle

--

0.75 (0.55–1.03)

1.24 (1.12–1.38)

1.09 (0.82–1.44)

1.21 (1.01–1.44)

0.97 (0.67–1.40)

1.19 (1.02–1.39)

0.93 (0.83–1.04)

 

5-year cycle

--

--

--

0.74 (0.53–1.02)

1.06 (0.92–1.22)

1.12 (0.77–1.61)

1.29 (1.16–1.45)

1.02 (0.87–1.20)

 

Annual cycle

0.99 (0.75–1.31)

0.89 (0.44–1.79)

0.94 (0.70–1.26)

1.09 (0.95–1.25)

0.99 (0.86–1.14)

0.89 (0.77–1.03)

1.09 (0.94–1.26)

0.76 (0.46–1.24)

County population

3-year cycle

--

1.07 (0.92–1.25)

0.96 (0.83–1.11)

1.13 (0.67–1.92)

1.10 (0.95–1.27)

1.66 (1.03–2.70)

1.08 (0.55–2.10)

0.72 (0.62–0.85)

 

5-year

--

--

--

1.27 (0.63–2.54)

1.35 (0.96–1.90)

1.48 (0.88–2.47)

1.06 (0.72–1.56)

0.86 (0.73–1.03)

aAll drowning-related mortality rates are based on the calendar year that corresponds with the release of the ACS data cycle

-- ACS data cycle not available

Three results from the relative risk evaluations stand out. First, although some indicators were more predictive of injury disparities than others, including % Hispanic, % population without a high school diploma, and % residency less than one year, no indicator produced statistically significant estimates consistently over time or across data cycles. Second, the association between the indicators and drowning-related mortality rates did not consistently improve when the number of census areas included in the comparison increased. For example, on average the 3-year data cycle produced the greatest proportion of statistically significant estimates for all indicators and the annual file produced more statistically significant estimates than the 5-year file. Third, the proportion of African American persons per area consistently showed a protective effect of drowning-related mortality rates. This association should be interpreted with caution given the different demographic structure of rural census areas.

Discussion

We evaluated the reliability of 10 socioeconomic indicators derived from the annual and multi-year ACS data cycles that have previously been employed for monitoring disparities in injury risk. In addition, we assessed the predictability of each indicator for facilitating the detection of differences in injury risk on an annual and semi-annual basis at a national scale using county-level injury mortality data. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the reliability and predictability of the ACS for drowning-related injury mortality surveillance.

Three key findings from this study stand out. First, only five of the ten indicators produced reliable estimates of area socioeconomic conditions, but these five indicators were consistently reliable across all three data cycles. Second, when overlapping multi-year surveys were used to represent changes in annual socioeconomic conditions fewer than 25 % of all US counties generated estimates that were unlikely to have occurred by chance due to sampling error. Third, no socioeconomic indicator was consistently predictive of disparities in drowning-related mortality over time or across data cycles at the national scale. Taken together, the evidence uncovered by our analysis indicates that improvement in the reliability of the ACS can be made and that continuously predicting disparities in drowning-related injury risk at the national scale using census-level geographic data is not possible using these ten indicators.

Although these findings can be considered somewhat discouraging, in our view the ACS data cycles nonetheless provide two opportunities to advance injury surveillance and data collection. First, the study identified five socioeconomic indicators that are consistently reliable across ACS data cycles: % college/graduate degree, % high school graduation, Gini coefficient, median household income, and county population. The majority of these indicators are known to be predictive of other injury-related outcomes (Bell et al. 2014). For these indicators, researchers could employ the annual ACS data cycle as a barometer for current socioeconomic conditions, while using the multi-year files to confirm and add precedence to the changing landscape of disparities in injury risk. Second, the indicator county population was the most consistently reliable indicator across ACS survey cycles and also the least likely to be effected by sampling error in the overlap analysis. This supports the use of using either an annual or multi-year population file to estimate yearly or semi-yearly changes in drowning-related deaths, which is one of three drowning-related indicators prioritized by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) (Thomas & Johnson 2014). By extension, the same indicator could be used to inform the Healthy People 2020 target of a 10 % reduction target for drowning related deaths over the next decade (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020) However, additional tests are required to determine if the annual file can substitute for either of the multi-year data cycles with respect to monitoring age-adjusted trends relevant to hospitalizations or emergency department visits, both of which are monitored by the NCIPC.

That only a small portion of all census areas generated statistically significant differences between overlapping multi-year surveys suggests that researchers should be judicious if using the yearly released multi-year files to represent annual socioeconomic conditions. While socioeconomic conditions do change over time, that the majority of socioeconomic indicators were not statistically significantly different between overlapping survey years suggests that any observed differences obtained from the ACS could be attributed to sampling error rather than any ‘real’ changes in area unemployment rates, poverty levels, and other demographic changes. This suggests that the best way to employ the multi-year files for injury surveillance is on a semi-annually basis, using the full 3- and 5-year gaps between release years. The results of the regression model lend credence to this finding as the association between the indicators and drowning-related deaths did not increase as a result of increasing the number of census areas in the analysis. Notwithstanding this limitation in the data, access to current socioeconomic information – even if limited to the annual ACS data file – is a significant strength of the survey as it brings greater currency to efforts to monitor trends, (Injury Surveillance Workgroup. Consensus Recommendations for Using Hospital Discharge Data for Injury Surveillance. State and Territorial Injury Prevention Directors Association & Marietta (GA) 2003; Kozak et al. 2004) improves upon the information required for regional policy and planning for about prevention needs, (Centers for Disease Control 1998; Centers for Disease Control 1999; Hiller et al. 2009; Mireles et al. 2015) and improves access to information that can impact legislation to improve civic safety (Everett et al. 1997; Helmkamp et al. 2012; Pressley et al. 2009).

Importantly, findings from this study must be viewed within the context of three key limitations. Firstly, the evaluation of injury risk was limited to mortality records. While evidence does show that indicators of injury mortality are similarly indicative of injury morbidity (Bell et al. 2014) additional evaluations of hospitalization data against these ACS indicators are needed. Secondly, we included only area socioeconomic indicators in our evaluation, excluding other important covariates known to lead to disparities in drowning-related injury risk, including alcohol consumption (Petridou & Klimentopoulou 2006) the use of safety device, (Treser et al. 1997) and duration of rescue (Topjian et al. 2012). These limitations stem from the lack of documentation in national mortality records. Although this information is obtainable from databases such as the National Trauma Registry (NTR), the evaluation would have to be completed on a state-by-state basis using hospital discharge abstracts because the NTR does not release fine-scale geographic identifiers at the patient-level. Thirdly, the study was limited to census counties as opposed to smaller geographic scales, such as zip codes, census tracts, or block faces. Previous studies have shown that differences in risk attributable to socioeconomic position, or status, are typically largest when viewed using census tracts or blocks (Hameed et al. 2010; Krieger et al. 2003). However, fine-scale evaluation of the ACS would require state-by-state evaluations as the NCHS does not release US mortality data at a geographic scale below Census County. Within the context of this study’s objectives, US county boundaries are the smallest geographic unit available to assess the reliability and predictability of socioeconomic indicators derived from all three ACS data cycles.

Conclusion

Despite being highly preventable, injuries are the leading cause of death in the US among all persons under the age of 44 and also the cause of morbidity and mortality with the steepest social gradient (Steenland et al. 2004). For decades, the long-form decennial census served as the primary source of socioeconomic information on the injured patient due to the lack of contextual data contained in hospital registries. Although the full impact of the 2010 replacement of the long-form census with the ACS is still being determined, evidence thus far has shown key weaknesses of the survey. To date, there has been no report on the reliability of the ACS for injury surveillance despite considerable versatility in its application (Aytur et al. 2013; Curry et al. 2015; Hong et al. 2015; Huguet et al. 2014; Landy et al. 2011; Perry et al. 2015; Sastry & Gregory 2013). Our study adds much needed information about the reliability of the ACS and provides a guideline for appropriate monitoring strategies using the annual and multi-year ACS data cycles for drowning-related injury surveillance and data collection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) for providing access to the Compressed Mortality File for this study. All interpretations and conclusions reached in this study are those of the authors and not the NCHS. The authors also wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for reviewing the initial draft of the manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Nursing, University of South Carolina
(2)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
(3)
Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina

References

  1. Alexander CH. Still Rolling: Leslie Kish’s “Rolling Samples” and the American Community Survey. Survey Methodol. 2002;28:35–41.Google Scholar
  2. Aytur SA, Rodriguez DA, Kerr ZY, Ji K, Evenson KR. Spatial and temporal patterns of North Carolina pedestrian and bicycle plans. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19(3 Suppl 1):S83–8. PubMed PMID: MEDLINE:23529061.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell N, Arrington A, Adams S. Census-based socioeconomic indicators for monitoring injury causes in the USA: a review. Injury Prevention. 2014; doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041444
  4. Brenner RA, Trumble AC, Smith GS, Kessler EP, Overpeck MD. Where children drown, United States, 1995. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):85–9. PubMed Epub 2001/07/04. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne ML, Lewis-Michl EL, Stark AD. Unintentional drownings among New York State residents, 1988–1994. Public Health Reports (Washington, DC: 1974). 2003;118(5):448–58. PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC1497570. Epub 2003/08/28. eng.Google Scholar
  6. Burrows S, Auger N, Gamache P, Hamel D. Leading Causes of Unintentional Injury and Suicide Mortality in Canadian Adults Across the Urban–rural Continuum. Public Health Reports (Washington, DC: 1974). 2013;128:443–53.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control. Suicide prevention evaluation in a Western Athabaskan American Indian tribe–New Mexico,1988–1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:257–61.Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control. Suicide prevention among active duty Air Force personnel–United States, 1990–1999 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:1053–7.Google Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control. Causes of Injury Death: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control,; 2013 [cited 2015 October 6]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/leadingcauses.html.
  10. Cortes LM, Hargarten SW, Hennes HM. Recommendations for water safety and drowning prevention for travelers. J Travel Med. 2006;13(1):21–34. PubMed PMID: WOS:000234809600005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Curry AE, Pfeiffer MR, Durbin DR, Elliott MR, Kim KH. Young driver licensing: Examination of population-level rates using New Jersey’s state licensing database. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;76:49–56. PubMed PMID: WOS:000351961500007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Depczynski J, Fragar L, Hawkins A, Stiller L. Safe play areas for prevention of young children drowning in farm dams. Australasian J Early Childhood. 2009;34(3):50–7. PubMed PMID: WOS:000208024400007.Google Scholar
  13. Environmental Systems Research Institute. The American Community Survey: An ESRI white paper: ESRI; 2014 [cited 2015 May 1]. Available from: https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/the-american-community-survey.pdf.
  14. Everett SA, Kann L, McReynolds L. The youth risk behavior surveillance system: Policy and program applications. J Sch Health. 1997;67(8):333–5. PubMed PMID: WOS:000070993800005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Giashuddin SM, Rahman A, Rahman F, Mashreky SR, Chowdhury SM, Linnan M, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in child injury in Bangladesh - implication for developing countries. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:7. PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2676296, Epub 2009/03/25. eng.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilchrist J, Parker E. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Fatal Unintentional Drowning Among Persons Aged ≤29 Years — United States, 1999–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(19):421–6.Google Scholar
  17. Girasek DC. Evaluation of a brief intervention designed to increase CPR training among pregnant pool owners. Health Educ Res. 2011;26(4):689–97. PubMed PMID: WOS:000293026500010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hameed SM, Bell N, Schuurman N. Analyzing the effects of place on injury: Does the choice of geographic scale and zone matter? 2010.Google Scholar
  19. Helmkamp JC, Aitken ME, Graham J, Campbell CR. State-Specific ATV-Related Fatality Rates: An Update in the New Millennium. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(4):364–74. PubMed PMID: WOS:000306622600004.Google Scholar
  20. Hiller P, Kaan S, Wiggins N. Youth Violence Prevention Partnership: 2009–2010 Report: Multnomah County Health Department; [cited 2015 February 19]. Available from: https://multco.us/file/19739/download.
  21. Hong L, Liu Y, Hottel TL, Hoff GL, Cai J. Neighborhood socio-economic context and emergency department visits for dental care in a US Midwestern metropolis. Public Health. 2015;129(3):252–7. PubMed PMID: WOS:000351300600009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Huguet N, Kaplan MS, McFarland BH. The Effects of Misclassification Biases on Veteran Suicide Rate Estimates. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(1):151–5. PubMed PMID: WOS:000341701400042.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Injury Surveillance Workgroup. Consensus Recommendations for Using Hospital Discharge Data for Injury Surveillance. State and Territorial Injury Prevention Directors Association, Marietta (GA) 2003.Google Scholar
  24. Kim M-H, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I, Kim C-Y. Association between childhood fatal injuries and socioeconomic position at individual and area levels: a multilevel study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(2):135–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kozak L, DeFrances C, Hall M. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2004 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital and Health Statistics. 2006;13(162).Google Scholar
  26. Krieger N, Waterman PD, Chen JT, Soobader M, Subramanian SV. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures -- the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003;118(3):240–60. PubMed Language: English. Entry Date: 20041105. Revision Date: 20091218. Publication Type: journal article.Google Scholar
  27. Landy DC, Mintzer MJ, Silva AK, Schulman CI. Hispanic Ethnicity and Unintentional Injury Mortality in the Elderly. J Surg Res. 2011;166(1):28–31. PubMed PMID: WOS:000288167300015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Leavy JE, Crawford G, Leaversuch F, Nimmo L, McCausland K, Jancey J. A Review of Drowning Prevention Interventions for Children and Young People in High, Low and Middle Income Countries. J Community Health. 2015 Oct 24. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leavy JE, Crawford G, Portsmouth L, Jancey J, Leaversuch F, Nimmo L, et al. Recreational Drowning Prevention Interventions for Adults, 1990–2012: A Review. J Community Health. 2015b;40(4):725–35. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mireles T, Ruskin T, Harrell K. Boston STRYVE: Comprehensive Plan [cited 2015 February 19]. Available from: https://prezi.com/7_9teh1nmwyz/boston-stryve-comprehensive-plan/.
  31. National Research Council. Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and challenges. Washington: National Academy Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  32. Peek-Asa C, Zwerling C, Stallones L. Acute Traumatic Injuries in Rural Populations. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1689–93. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Perry EC, Shields WC, O’Brocki R, Bishai D, Frattaroli S, Jones V, et al. Examining Fire Department Injury Data as a Tool for Epidemiological Investigation. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36(2):310–4. PubMed PMID: WOS:000350395100027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Petridou E, Klimentopoulou A. Risk factors for drowning. In: Bierens JJLM, editor. Handbook on drowning: Prevention, rescue, treatment Heidelberg. Germany: Springer; 2006. p. 63–9.Google Scholar
  35. Pressley JC, Benedicto CB, Trieu L, Kendig T, Barlow B. Motor Vehicle Injury, Mortality, and Hospital Charges by Strength of Graduated Driver Licensing Laws in 36 States. J Trauma-Injury Infection Critical Care. 2009;67(1):S43–53. PubMed PMID: WOS:000267953200010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Saluja G, Brenner RA, Trumble AC, Smith GS, Schroeder T, Cox C. Swimming Pool Drownings Among US Residents Aged 5–24 Years: Understanding Racial/Ethnic Disparities. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(4):728–33. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sastry N, Gregory J. The effect of Hurricane Katrina on the prevalence of health impairments and disability among adults in New Orleans: differences by age, race, and sex. Soc Sci Med. 2013;80:121–9. PubMed PMID: MEDLINE:23321678.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Singh GK. Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969–1998. Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1137–43. PubMed PMID: WOS:000183827200039.Google Scholar
  39. Spielman SE, Folch D, Nagle N. Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey. Applied Geography. 2014 Jan;46:147–57. PubMed PMID: WOS:000331991600015.Google Scholar
  40. Steenland K, Hu S, Walker J. All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality by Socioeconomic Status Among Employed Persons in 27 US States, 1984–1997. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1037–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas K, Johnson R. State injury indicators report: Instructions for Preparing 2012 Data. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2014.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson DC, Rivara FP. Pool fencing for preventing drowning in children. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2000 (2):CD001047. PubMed Epub 2000/05/05. eng.Google Scholar
  43. Topjian AA, Berg RA, Bierens JJLM, Branche CM, Clark RS, Friberg H, et al. Brain Resuscitation in the Drowning Victim. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(3):441–67. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Treser CD, Trusty MN, Yang PP. Personal floatation device usage: Do educational efforts have an impact? J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(3):346–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 : injury and violence prevention Washington: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; [cited 2015 March 10]. Available from: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/injury-and-violence-prevention/objectives.
  46. US Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 2008.Google Scholar
  47. US Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What PUMS Data Users Need to Know. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 2009.Google Scholar
  48. Wallis BA, Watt K, Franklin RC, Taylor M, Nixon JW, Kimble RM. Interventions associated with drowning prevention in children and adolescents: systematic literature review. Inj Prev. 2015;21(3):195–204. PubMed.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilkinson R, Pickett K. Income inequality and socioeconomic gradients in mortality. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(4):699–704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright S, Marlenga B, Lee BC. Childhood Agricultural Injuries: An Update for Clinicians. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care. 2013;43(2):20–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bell and Cai. 2015